That Health Rules

It is easier to convince a child to eat meat than to eat veggies.  This scenario is given.  We are exposed to too many ads on meat whether chicken meat or beef meat on TV and newspapers.  It is therefore a challenge to parents to introduce other varieties of food that we deem healthier to the next generation.  It may take us some time to be successful but a little step can indeed go a long way overtime!

Now comes another study to support the concept that meat is really not neat!  Published in the latest edition of  Archives of Internal Medicine:

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Background  High intakes of red or processed meat may increase the risk of mortality. Our objective was to determine the relations of red, white, and processed meat intakes to risk for total and cause-specific mortality.

Methods  The study population included the National Institutes of Health–AARP (formerly known as the American Association of Retired Persons) Diet and Health Study cohort of half a million people aged 50 to 71 years at baseline. Main outcome measures included total mortality and deaths due to cancer, cardiovascular disease, injuries and sudden deaths, and all other causes.

Results  There were 47 976 male deaths and 23 276 female deaths during 10 years of follow-up.

• Men and women in the highest vs lowest quintile of red (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.27-1.35], and HR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.30-1.43], respectively) and processed meat (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.12-1.20], and HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.20-1.31], respectively) intakes had elevated risks for overall mortality.
• Regarding cause-specific mortality, men and women had elevated risks for cancer mortality for red (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.16-1.29], and HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.12-1.30], respectively) and processed meat (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06-1.19], and HR, 1.11 [95% CI 1.04-1.19], respectively) intakes.
• Furthermore, cardiovascular disease risk was elevated for men and women in the highest quintile of red (HR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.20-1.35], and HR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.37-1.65], respectively) and processed meat (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.03-1.15], and HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.26-1.51], respectively) intakes.
• When comparing the highest with the lowest quintile of white meat intake, there was an inverse association for total mortality and cancer mortality, as well as all other deaths for both men and women.

Conclusion  Red and processed meat intakes were associated with modest increases in total mortality, cancer mortality, and cardiovascular disease mortality.

^{_________________________________________________________________________________________________________}

This study further confirms the relationship between red meat and cancer, heart and overall risk of death.  Likewise, the study also showed that fish or intake of white meat was associated with a reduction in the risk of death.

Translating the data to common language…it means…

Over 10 years, those that eat meat equivalent to a quarter-pound hamburger can increase ones risk to die from cancer by 22 percent and the risk to die from heart disease by 27 percent. 

Bottom Line is:

Cut The Red Meat… Enjoy Fish in time for the Lenten Season….

There are many conflicting data on soy protein and the heart especially the claim that they lower cholesterol.  In fact in 1999 based on studies during that time, the US FDA allowed a health claim on food labels stating that a daily diet containing 25 grams of soy protein, also low in saturated fat and cholesterol, may reduce the risk of heart disease. 

However, the American Heart association in January of 2006 made a review of available data and made a conclusion that soy protein in itself did not significantly lower the bad cholestrol nor did it have any significant effect in increasing the good cholesterol.

But as an endocrinologist looking for alternative source of meat protein, the use of soy protein in place of meat which has high staurated fat will continue to play a major role in our attempt to reduce the risk of our patients from cardiovascular disease.

Recently a new article on the benefit of soy protein came out in Annals of Internal Medicine.  This study is so relevant to my practice especially among diabetic patients with kidney disease.  These are the patients we try to avoid taking meat protein because of the possibility of causing kidney function deterioration.  The study did not only show a good effect in sugar control but also markers of inflammation suggesting a potential effect in reducing cardiovascular disease plus improving markers of kidney function.

________________________________________________________________________________________

Soy protein consumption significantly affected cardiovascular risks such as fasting plasma glucose , total cholesterol , LDL cholesterol, and serum triglyceride concentrations.

Serum CRP levels were significantly decreased by soy protein intake compared with those in the control group .

Significant improvements were also seen in proteinuria  and urinary creatinine ( both measures od kidney function) by consumption of soy protein.

CONCLUSIONS—Longitudinal soy protein consumption significantly affected cardiovascular risk factors and kidney-related biomarkers among type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy.

^{______________________________________________________________________________________________________}

Here is a list of the common sources of soy protein that we can enjoy includes: Tofu, soymilk, soyflour. Tempeh and Miso.  The soymilk and textured soy protein can be used as subsitute for meat or cows milk while the soyflour can be used in baking needs.

I believe in the benefits of soy protein.  I hope for more studies to come that will provide us with more data on its beneifts and potential to reduce disease risk especially the Heart!

Soy Protein: A Better Partner for the Heart!